I found an older facebook post in which I had listed ten in 2014, and then listed what I thought would have been my list when I was 23 (1979).
Here is the 2019 list, and I'll make the images links to the facebook posts, which might still be there.
In that game above, the original "copy this and tag" chain-letter game had a phrase that irked me, and probably is what inspired me to think of "book" in a broader sense.
August 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM
Instructions: in your status, list 10 books that have stayed with you in some way. Don't think too hard. They don't have to be the "right" books or great works of literature, but they should be ones that have affected you in some way. Tag 10 friends including the one who tagged you so they can see your list.
1. Whole Child, Whole Parent (Berrien Berends)No one tagged me, so I'm not tagging. It's just going to sit here. :-)
2. Conceptual Blockbusting (Adams)
3. Slapstick (Vonnegutt)
4. Zen Lessons, The Art of Leadership (Cleary, translator)
5. Slowing Down to the Speed of Life (Carlson)
6. The Monastic World (Brooke/Swaan)
7. Learning All the Time (Holt)
8. Man and his Symbols (Jung)
9. The American Heritage Dictionary (editions with the wonderful etymologies since 1969; not all have the etymologies)
10. Material World (Menzel)
A couple of recent books I keep referring to and thinking of won't have as many years to affect me as the books above have had, but they're affecting me this year:
Smarter Than you Think (Thompson), about people, computers and the internet(I'll tag people who have already played, whose lists I read: Pam Sorooshian, Rose Sorooshian, Roxana Sorooshian)
Bad For You: Exposing the War on Fun (Pyle, Cunningham)
I was thinking about what my list would have been when I was in my early-to-mid 20's. The only two above would have been Slapstick and The American Heritage Dictonary.Probably then, those didn't have the roots in me that they have now.
I think my list when I was 23 or so would have been:
Oliver TwistBut the books I didn't list above that are important in my life are reference books, not read-start-to-finish books (The Oxford English Dictionary; Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable), and collections (The Children's Hour, which I've had since before I was in school; Grimm's Fairy Tales; Chaucer; Shakespeare; Poe; various Robin Hoods, and various King Arthurs and the art in them). I liked the Science Fiction magazines on newsprint, in the 60's, and LOOK magazine, and MAD magazine. I liked Childcraft books (which friends had, I didn't) and the series on sewing and needlework that someone was putting out in hardback in the 1970's (which I saw and borrowed but didn't own).
The Bible
The Sneetches and Other Stories (still important ideas)
The Lord of the Rings
Life on a Medieval Barony
The English and Scottish Popular Ballads (Child)
The Ballad Book of John Jacob Niles
The Annotated Mother Goose (Baring-Gould(s))
Joan Baez Ballad Book
Be Here Now (Ram Dass)
In that game above, the original "copy this and tag" chain-letter game had a phrase that irked me, and probably is what inspired me to think of "book" in a broader sense. It was "Let’s promote literacy and a book." "Literacy"? Let's "promote literacy"? Lots of "promotion of literacy" is small-minded snobbery (said I, perhaps in my own small-minded snob mode). How about let's look more realistically at what books are, and reading, and why some people are so full-in invested in the worship of books and villification of any other kind of input, to the point that they're not even sure what "a book" is, or what literacy would be, in the 21st Century, or what it became by the mid-20th.
ReplyDeleteJust this week there...
When I got to that point in the rant, I realized I had jumped the tracks. I will take that rant elsewhere. :-)
https://www.facebook.com/groups/755519507972056/permalink/1187351944788808/